Skip to content

Most Reliable Hosting Company Sites in July 2022

Rank Performance Graph OS Outage
hh:mm:ss
Failed
Req%
DNS Connect First
byte
Total
1 Aruba Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.369 0.007 0.028 0.099
2 Rackspace Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.486 0.010 0.021 0.022
3 New York Internet (NYI) FreeBSD 0:00:00 0.000 0.564 0.075 0.150 0.150
4 Bigstep Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.183 0.079 0.155 0.155
5 ServerStack Linux 0:00:00 0.000 0.222 0.107 0.214 0.214
6 Swishmail Linux 0:00:00 0.009 0.174 0.107 0.211 0.211
7 Pair Networks Linux 0:00:00 0.009 0.370 0.118 0.236 0.236
8 Hyve Managed Hosting Linux 0:00:00 0.017 0.141 0.094 0.186 0.186
9 www.flexential.com Linux 0:00:00 0.017 0.254 0.111 0.223 0.223
10 CWCS Managed Hosting Linux 0:00:00 0.043 0.313 0.067 0.153 0.153

See full table

Aruba had the most reliable hosting company site in July 2022, dominating the leaderboard for the second month running. Aruba has data centres in Italy and the Czech Republic, and their services include cloud computing as well as hosting and domains.

The remaining podium places also remained unchanged, with Rackspace coming in second and New York Internet(NYI) taking third place once again. Rackspace offers a variety of data, security, and cloud services, with data centres around the world, whilst NYI provides hybrid IT solutions.

In July, the top five companies, which this month included Bigstep and ServerStack, responded to all of Netcraft’s requests. Additionally, Linux was the most popular operating system, being used by nine out of the top ten hosting companies. NYI was the only company using FreeBSD.

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of around fifteen leading hosting providers’ sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

From a customer’s point of view, the percentage of failed requests is more pertinent than outages on hosting companies’ own sites, as this gives a pointer to reliability of routing, and this is why we choose to rank our table by fewest failed requests, rather than shortest periods of outage. In the event the number of failed requests are equal then sites are ranked by average connection times.

Information on the measurement process and current measurements is available.